BATCH-4751 · filed

Brand & Market News

63% of consumers doubt premium beauty works better: McKinsey

McKinsey's State of Beauty 2025 shows a $450bn market slowing to 5% growth as 63% of consumers doubt premium products outperform mass-market lines.

By Marcus Bennett · · 4 min read · 839 words

Composition

  1. 63% of consumers do not believe premium beauty products outperform mass-market alternatives, per McKinsey's State of Beauty 2025.
  2. The global beauty market, worth nearly $450 billion, is projected to slow from 7% annual growth (2022–2024) to about 5% through 2030.
  3. Only 13% of consumers cite a brand's founder as a key purchase driver; 75% of companies are shifting away from price-increase-led strategies.
  4. E-commerce is expected to reach almost a third of global beauty sales by 2030, up from 26% in 2024.
  5. Of 46 indie brands at $50–200 million in sales by 2017, only two had surpassed $750 million by 2022, McKinsey data shows.

Sixty-three percent of consumers do not believe premium beauty products perform better than mass-market alternatives, according to McKinsey & Company's State of Beauty 2025 report. That single datapoint frames the strategic problem facing a global cosmetics market now worth nearly $450 billion: growth is decelerating from 7% annually between 2022 and 2024 to a projected 5% per year through 2030, and the old lever — price increases — is losing its pull.

The report identifies 2024 as a turning point for the industry. Geopolitical uncertainty, market saturation and a fundamental shift in consumer behaviour are the brakes, but shoppers are not spending less on beauty. They are spending differently.

Where does perceived value now sit?

Consumers are becoming sharply selective about which categories justify their price positioning. McKinsey's survey found 83% of respondents consider haircare accessible, but that figure drops to 67% for fragrances. Facial serums retain an inherently "premium" perception; every other segment now has to prove its price point earns its place on shelf.

The report also dents two long-standing industry assumptions. The myth of the charismatic founder is fading — only 13% of consumers cite a brand's founder as a key purchase driver. And with perceived value now the main competitive battleground, 75% of companies are pursuing sales-acceleration strategies that depend less on price increases and more on demonstrable efficacy and distinctiveness.

For formulators and brand managers, the implication is direct: claims substantiation and ingredient storytelling carry more commercial weight than premium pricing architecture or founder-led marketing.

Which markets and channels will drive the next 5%?

The geographic map is rebalancing. The United States remains the essential benchmark market, but India and the Middle East offer the most promising growth. China is recovering, though more slowly than its pre-pandemic trajectory.

Channel economics are shifting just as fast. Digital advertising effectiveness is declining under channel saturation and rising costs, while integrated omnichannel strategies gain ground. E-commerce is projected to reach almost a third of global beauty sales by 2030, up from 26% in 2024 — yet physical retail will remain central to product discovery.

AI adoption, despite the noise around it, remains shallow: only 10% of companies use AI systematically, while 60% are still in an exploratory phase.

Can indie brands and K-beauty scale?

McKinsey's State of Fashion 2023–2027 analysis, cited in the report, quantifies the scaling problem for indie brands. Of 46 brands founded in 2005 or later that reached global retail sales of $50–200 million by 2017, only five had surpassed $250 million by 2022, and just two had passed $750 million. Low barriers to entry do not translate into durable scale.

K-beauty is the exception that proves scaling is possible. Snail mucin serums, viral via TikTok and influencers, carried small brands such as CosRX into international markets — and ultimately into acquisition by Amorepacific, Korea's largest cosmetics company. For procurement teams, the lesson is that ingredient-led virality can create acquisition targets fast.

What does the B Corp Beauty Coalition change?

Running parallel to the market shift is a responsibility agenda consolidated under the B Corp Beauty Coalition, a global alliance of B Lab-certified brands tackling ethical ingredient sourcing, sustainable packaging, anti-greenwashing and certification standards through collective action.

Its membership illustrates the compliance and sourcing directions worth monitoring:

  • Apivita, founded in Athens in 1979 by pharmacists Niki and Nikos Koutsianas, was the first Greek company to earn B Corp certification in 2017. It builds natural skincare, bodycare and haircare on propolis, honey, royal jelly and medicinal plants, operates from a bioclimatic headquarters in Markopoulo Industrial Park, and partners with more than 41 philanthropic associations.
  • Arbonne, founded in the US in 1980 by Petter Mørck, excludes more than 2,000 ingredients from its formulations — an exclusion list that helped define the "clean beauty" movement.
  • Concept4, founded in Hong Kong in 2003 with offices in China, India, France and the US, supplies beauty accessories, packaging and lifestyle products, embedding sustainability across the value chain — the coalition's B2B arm.

Is the circular economy reaching the INCI list?

Circular feedstocks are the coalition's most formulation-relevant frontier. Polish B Corp EcoBean, founded by Kacper Kossowski and Marcin Koziorowski, converts coffee waste into coffee oil, antioxidants, PLA, lignin and protein additives — low-emission circular inputs with applications from packaging to biodegradable flowerpots that nourish soil as they decompose.

Food-chain by-products are entering cosmetics more broadly. NASTE beauty, created by Italian benefit startup Vortex SRL SB, builds product lines on apple pulp plus hazelnut, spirulina and blueberry waste; other brands repurpose whey, pistachio shells and grape seeds, all rich in valuable compounds. For R&D teams, these streams offer both differentiated INCI stories and potential supply resilience.

The picture McKinsey draws is a sector exiting its "more is more" era. The next data point to watch: whether the projected 5% growth to 2030 holds as value-led strategies — efficacy proof, certification and circular ingredients — replace price increases as the industry's primary growth engine.

via renewablematter.eu (Original)

Filed under

  • beauty-market-trends
  • premium-beauty
  • consumer-behavior
  • b-corp-beauty-coalition
  • circular-economy

More from Marcus Bennett

Marcus Bennett

Show full bio

Correspondent covering consumer brands and retail at INCI File.

105 articles

Cross-references · Related articles

« Previous articleNext article »

End of monograph · 4 min read